Interview with Suzie Miller

Posted by Thom Smyth, February 24th, 2014

Tasked with gathering the thoughts, fears, opinions, and confessions of 2000 teenagers from across the country, Suzie Miller distilled them down into OneFiveZeroSeven, Barking Gecko Theatre Company’s follow-up to the successful Driving Into Walls which recently showcased at the Australian Performing Arts Market. The new work is on now as part of Perth Festival, and Thom Smyth (TS) discussed the show with Suzie (SM) ahead of its opening. Images courtesy Cameron Etchells and Barking Gecko, and Suzie Miller.


TS | The title OneFiveZeroSeven refers to a few different stats about the lives of teens. How did you go about quantifying all of those? Did the interviewees trawl through everything they own?

SM | Yes – we asked that they count or document every single item in their bedrooms. It was an interesting question because it lead us to a dialogue about so much more than just what they owned.Through the details provided we learnt what was important and precious to them, what was a left over from childhood and what items had special stories attached to them.

TS | Driving Into Walls focussed on the stories and experiences of WA teens, while OneFiveZeroSeven draws from all corners of the Australian teen experience. Do WA teens have a different experience growing up here, or are there common challenges that emerge?

SM | Interestingly there are many commonalities amongst Australian teenagers, but also quite distinct variations. I found that WA teens were possibly more in touch with the environment and landscape. There was a real sense of appreciation for the space and beauty of WA, and a certain sense of belonging to WA first rather than to Australia.

TS | There was some controversy about some of the revelations in Driving. Are there any uncomfortable home truths revealed in the new work?

SM | I think there many truths revealed but nothing sensational or disrespectful, indeed one of the guiding principles that John Sheedy and I have applied (and one that is fully supported by the fabulous Barking Gecko team) is that we want to be true to the trust placed in us by way of bringing the teen voice to the stage – not to censor or manipulate it to suit demands. The feedback we received after Driving Into Walls was that the material rang true with young people and that their lives were reflected accurately in the piece, and to be honest that was our aim. To let the lives of young people speak to the rest of the nation.


TS | When dealing with these intensely personal stories and reflections, are there any areas you won’t go? Is everything open for discussion?

SM | Everything is open for discussion. Of course in a group setting, if there was anything that was disrespectful of others in the room that would have been different – however we never had an issue with the participants. Even tricky areas were discussed frankly and amongst the personal stories, the sometime tears and the really honest dialogue were some extremely humbling moments.

TS | No two teens would have the same experiences growing up. How do you go about creating a script from such diverse and potentially contradictory content?

SM | No two people would even have the same experience of the same event so yes this was a fundamental area to discuss in the experience. The amount of information collected, the notes I have in my writing studio and the sheer volume of data is overwhelming – and often one story or experience was a play in itself. How, as a writer do you condense all of this, select the stories and the experiences that are most reflective without leaving out some of the more poignant moments? I wont lie, it’s a challenge, however it becomes obvious at a certain point which themes and ideas are emerging from the whole, and so I begin by weaving those bits together, and then trying to cut it down to a mere 60 minutes. Of course John and I would love to have the 9 hour version but without that amount of stage time we must make decisions about what is most resonant and what form this takes on stage to give the audience a definite ‘feel’ of the lives we are documenting.

TS | You are working with the same creative team as Driving. Did you approach the new show in the same way, or was this an entirely new experience?

SONY DSCSM | Same team, entirely different process and show! Although I have to say working with the same team meant we already had the most amazing working relationships leading to easy communication and wonderful collaboration. It wasn’t even just the same director, writer, choreographer but also the same sound, lighting and other designers – this allowed for an even more creative room that could build upon each others ideas in a dynamic and fluid manner.

TS | You’re working with Danielle Micich on this project and on Overexposed which is coming out later this year. How do you approach the relationship between text and movement as a writer?

SM | It’s different every time. The works with Gecko are working with young performers on a work that is based on a verbatim content and style. With Overexposed  the text is a psychological thriller that explores something quite layered and adult in a manner that is not about high energy movement but about the notion of expressing an internal dialogue within the self onto the very body of the character. There are areas of Overexposed that are strongly text based and others that are much less reliant on text. The creative team is an astonishing array of artists with Danielle at the helm. Having already worked so closely with Danielle it is such a pleasure to be closely involved with this project – and indeed it is a different structure to previous works with this piece being written after much consultation amongst the entire creative team. A three-week creative development has allowed these creative relationships to grow together and to devise a show that is completely unique.

OneFiveZeroSeven runs until 1 March at the State Theatre Centre of WA Studio Underground. Tickets/info>>

Interview: Will O’Mahony | The Skeletal System

Posted by Thom Smyth, February 13th, 2014

Will O’Mahony had a breakthrough year in 2013, with two sellout productions at The Blue Room Theatre with his company The Skeletal System – The Improved (as part of Fringe World 2013) and Great White – and a swag of award wins and nominations, including five Equity Award nominations for Best Production, Best Director and Best Actor. Thom Smyth (TS) caught up with him as Great White returns to Perth stages at PICA Performance Space for The Blue Room Theatre Summer Nights at Fringe World. Great White runs until Saturday 15 February.

Great White_Lo Res

TS | Great White is resurfacing for Fringe World 2014 at PICA. How has it changed since its original  season at The Blue Room Theatre?

WO’M | I’ve just tweaked the given circumstances so that every character shares a relationship with the play’s central question: Is it ever ok to take the life of another? There are of course minor changes throughout the script and design, but I think Great White is now the play it was always trying to be.

TS | Young love vs a fin. Does it stay strong when a hungry fish approaches?

WO’M | I think we take terms like love for granted. Maybe we need more hungry fish to test love, and our definitions of it. Maybe love should be as scary as a fin – if you’re doing it right.

TS | What is ‘greatness’ to you? Does this idea play a lot on your mind?

WO’M | There’s this quote that I can’t quite get out of my head and it goes something like this: Don’t be surprised when the kindest act toward you in your life comes from an outsider not interested in reciprocation. I’ve been wondering for a long time whether greatness can be as simple as acknowledging that that person over there is just as real as you.

TS | Sharks are a hot topic at the moment. How do you navigate the hype surrounding this politically-charged subject?

WO’M | The play was written well before the shark culling controversy surfaced so I feel it remains artistic rather than intellectualised or deliberately political. I want art that tilts, that offers a different perspective. If Great White prompts audiences to reconsider their position on this issue then it has done one of its jobs.

Both with balloons

TS | Creating an entirely aquatic environment within the confines of a very landlocked theatre venue is no mean feat. How did you approach this unique design challenge?

WO’M | I’m a firm believer in using the theatre to awaken and empower the imaginations of the audience. We needed something that looked like water, moved like water, sounded like water, but wasn’t water. When designer Alicia Clements presented me with a bag of blue balloons I knew she’d found our set.

TS | You’ve been named as someone to watch in 2014. Is that a big burden of expectation or a door-opening blessing?

WO’M | I think I’m now old enough to appreciate that the doors you speak of never open easy. You’ve still got to boot them hard and hope you won’t break your foot. But it’s nice to know that there are people who believe in my work and development and if anything I don’t want to embarrass them by taking any of this for granted.


Great White runs until Saturday 15 February at PICA Performance Space.